Pretty wonderful that a car flipped at freeway speeds and no one was seriously hurt. Are any prices pending towards the horse proprietor? I do not want to forged aspersions without evidence, so I will not identify the enterprise, but it surely seems fairly apparent a guess that the horses have been at a sure ranch and escaped. In that case, the owners probably board them there and the responsibility belongs with the ranch. May not be the owner's/house owners' fault. Sure, the vast majority of horses in the realm are boarded, not stabled on horse owner property. Fairly horrible time for these drivers, although. That is awful, & it might've been even worse. The property on each sides belongs to Stanford U. PVEC is a bunch of sub-barns and there is at the very least one if no more additional operations farther up Ansel Lane. 280 the horses would have come from. Could you think about that somebody intended their horses to be killed on the freeway? Too dangerous it took the CHP an hour to solid the SIG alert - it seems they didn't react in time to forestall persevering with tragedy? Only for the report they did not come from PVTC! So forged all the aspersions you want! I did not "blame" anybody, nor did I "imagine" someone wished hurt, word my use of the phrase "escape". I still doubt that would be the case. I was referring to @superb that thought the owners could be liable. As for my guess, after wanting on the map, I'm glad I did not say the name, the one I used to be guessing is on the south facet of 280, with the long lease. You'd want more than a handful of fingers to depend. My error stems from being a north peninsula gal, I nonetheless think of 280 as north/south! The information reported this morning that they got unfastened from Webb Ranch. I am more accustomed to the south aspect stables; I have no idea which is the most obvious (ie.. Someone thought they had latched a gate, but hadn't. The SJ Mercury News reports that https://just6f.com/ they wandered a mile from the corral the place a gate was left free. Mea culpa -- I was reacting defensively in protection of the ranch I rode at as a kid (WR) which is on the "south" side of 280. From what I know, all their horses are additionally on the opposite aspect of the creek from the 280 north on- ramp. There are going to be a lot of sad youngsters as well as us adult horse lovers. I am feeling very dangerous for the ranch and all the children who rode these horses in classes. I'm not feeling as dangerous for the ranch owners & kids who rode the horses as I am feeling for the horses themselves & the poor people who hit them. Glad no human lives had been misplaced and very sad for the lack of the horses. Sorry for my reactivity in earlier publish. Stunned anybody would blame the horse house owners. Hazards like deer (and, up to now, horses and cattle and even pedestrians and stalled automobiles) seem on 280. I try not to drive within the shoulder lane, particularly at night time, to present myself extra room to maneuver should a deer certain into the roadway. Many folks use 280 as a speedway! What are they going to do in the event that they hit a deer - sue the deer? I'm a long time Woodside and Portola Valley Resident. For the previous 15 years I've had cause to be on the 280 between the hours of 4:30-6:30am and that i can inform you not many maintain the pace limit. Velocity and over driving the reach of headlights are probably culprits, so please don't blame the poor horses and their house owners. It's as if drivers suppose that few drivers on the highway make it the Autobahn! They should treat it as though they're driving in icy circumstances - Slow down. The pace limit is about as the protected speed below superb circumstances, which includes daylight, anything less than excellent requires slower speeds. Perhaps if the CHP would spend extra time in the early hours monitoring site visitors we would have less gridlock that begins with wildlife (or comparatively lately domesticated animals) being hit and killed.
